Searched refs:pendingChange (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
510 final UidRecord.ChangeItem pendingChange = new UidRecord.ChangeItem(); in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges() local511 pendingChange.change = changesForPendingUidRecords[i]; in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()512 pendingChange.uid = i; in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()513 pendingChange.processState = procStatesForPendingUidRecords[i]; in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()514 pendingChange.procStateSeq = i; in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()515 changeItems.put(changesForPendingUidRecords[i], pendingChange); in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()516 mAms.mPendingUidChanges.add(pendingChange); in testDispatchUids_dispatchNeededChanges()748 uidRecord.pendingChange = changeItem; in testEnqueueUidChangeLocked_procStateSeqUpdated()796 uidRecord.pendingChange = null; in testEnqueueUidChangeLocked_dispatchUidsChanged()802 assertNotNull(uidRecord.pendingChange); in testEnqueueUidChangeLocked_dispatchUidsChanged()[all …]
115 ChangeItem pendingChange; field in UidRecord
3317 change.uidRecord.pendingChange = null; in dispatchUidsChanged()16548 final UidRecord.ChangeItem pendingChange; in enqueueUidChangeLocked() local16549 if (uidRec == null || uidRec.pendingChange == null) { in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16557 pendingChange = mAvailUidChanges.remove(NA-1); in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16559 "Retrieving available item: " + pendingChange); in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16561 pendingChange = new UidRecord.ChangeItem(); in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16563 "Allocating new item: " + pendingChange); in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16566 uidRec.pendingChange = pendingChange; in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16575 pendingChange.uidRecord = uidRec; in enqueueUidChangeLocked()16576 pendingChange.uid = uidRec != null ? uidRec.uid : uid; in enqueueUidChangeLocked()[all …]