Lines Matching full:fixme
24 // dr201 FIXME: write codegen test
34 // FIXME (export) dr204: no
57 // dr208 FIXME: write codegen test
68 // dr210 FIXME: write codegen test
120 // FIXME: Should reject this: 'f' has linkage but its type does not,
127 // FIXME: Should reject this: 'f' has linkage but its type does not,
278 B<my_T1, T2, my_I>::type b3; // FIXME: expected-error {{missing 'typename'}}
280 B<my_T1, T2, my_I3>::type b5; // FIXME: expected-error {{missing 'typename'}}
288 X<i, int>::type w; // FIXME: expected-error {{missing 'typename'}}
289 X<A::i, char>::type x; // FIXME: expected-error {{missing 'typename'}}
290 X<A<T>::i, double>::type y; // FIXME: expected-error {{missing 'typename'}}
309 // FIXME: This appears to be wrong: default arguments for function templates
327 // FIXME: This is ill-formed.
329 // FIXME: f, h, and i are ill-formed.
505 … f.N::F::~F(); // FIXME: expected-error {{expected the class name after '~' to name a destructor}} in g()
557 // FIXME: Should this also apply to c++98 mode? This was a DR against C++98.
560 // FIXME: expected-error@-2 {{expected ';'}}
687 // FIXME: We only apply this DR in C++11 mode.
712 // FIXME: When dr260 is resolved, also add tests for DR507.
718 // FIXME: This is ill-formed, with a diagnostic required, because operator new
728 // FIXME: These are ill-formed, with a required diagnostic, for the same
819 // FIXME: this should be rejected in c++98 too
824 // FIXME: this should be rejected in c++98 too
838 // FIXME: this should be rejected in c++98 too
843 // FIXME: this should probably be valid. the wording from the issue
847 // FIXME: likewise, this should also be valid.
904 friend inline void a(); // FIXME: ill-formed
906 friend inline void c(); // FIXME: ill-formed
935 struct B::X {}; // FIXME: ill-formed
952 struct D::X {}; // FIXME: ill-formed
989 // dr292 FIXME: write a codegen test
994 (void)static_cast<void (*)() throw()>(f); // FIXME: ill-formed in main()
995 (void)static_cast<void (*)() throw(int)>(f); // FIXME: ill-formed in main()
1063 // FIXME: should this apply to c++98 mode?