| /bionic/libm/upstream-netbsd/lib/libm/complex/ |
| D | ctanl.c | 53 w = MAXNUM + MAXNUM * I; in ctanl()
57 w = sinl(2.0L * creall(z)) / d + (sinhl(2.0L * cimagl(z)) / d) * I; in ctanl()
|
| D | ccosl.c | 44 w = cosl(creall(z)) * ch - (sinl(creall(z)) * sh) * I; in ccosl()
|
| D | csinl.c | 44 w = sinl(creall(z)) * ch + (cosl(creall(z)) * sh) * I; in csinl()
|
| D | csinhl.c | 44 w = sinhl(x) * cosl(y) + (coshl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; in csinhl()
|
| D | ccoshl.c | 44 w = coshl(x) * cosl(y) + (sinhl(x) * sinl(y)) * I; in ccoshl()
|
| D | cexpl.c | 45 w = r * cosl(y) + r * sinl(y) * I; in cexpl()
|
| D | ctanhl.c | 45 w = sinhl(2.0L * x) / d + (sinl(2.0L * y) / d) * I; in ctanhl()
|
| /bionic/tests/ |
| D | complex_test.cpp | 56 #undef I
253 ASSERT_EQ(2.0, creal(2.0 + 3.0I)); in TEST()
257 ASSERT_EQ(2.0f, crealf(2.0f + 3.0fI)); in TEST()
261 ASSERT_EQ(2.0, creall(2.0L + 3.0LI)); in TEST()
328 z = ctanh(nan("") + nan("") * I); in TEST()
349 z = ctanhf(nanf("") + nanf("") * I); in TEST()
371 z = ctanhl(nanl("") + nanl("") * I); in TEST()
|
| D | tgmath_test.c | 20 float complex z = 1 + 0.5*I; in tgmath_h_test_function()
|
| /bionic/tests/headers/posix/ |
| D | complex_h.c | 49 #if !defined(I)
50 #error I
|
| /bionic/docs/ |
| D | EINTR.md | 20 ### Can I just opt out?
36 ### Why don't I see this in Java code?
49 doing I/O works in Java behind the scenes!). As usual, C/C++ choose the more
|
| D | defines.md | 71 "I" in the 32-bit macro (since `int`, `long`, and pointers are all 32-bit
|
| D | fdsan.md | 10 *What problem is fdsan trying to solve? Why should I care?*
54 *How do I use fdsan?*
70 *No, really, how do I use fdsan?*
|
| D | elf-tls.md | 476 * On arm32, x86, and x86_64, the loader [should reject a TLS relocation]. (XXX: I haven't verified
622 breakage happening with Android N.](https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/38636) (XXX: I
835 find `pthread_internal_t`, though, rather than assume a fixed offset. (XXX: I think it could be
|
| D | clang_fortify_anatomy.md | 722 // (As a reminder, `-1` is "I don't know" when `(N & 2) == 0`.)
|
| /bionic/libc/include/ |
| D | complex.h | 44 #define I _Complex_I macro
|
| /bionic/libc/arch-x86/string/ |
| D | sse4-memcmp-slm.S | 101 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
118 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I argument
|
| D | sse2-memset-slm.S | 65 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
|
| D | sse2-strcpy-slm.S | 106 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
123 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I argument
|
| D | sse2-memset-atom.S | 65 #define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
|
| D | ssse3-memcpy-atom.S | 97 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
121 # define JMPTBL(I, B) I argument
|
| /bionic/libc/malloc_debug/ |
| D | README.md | 491 08-16 15:54:16.060 26947 26947 I libc : /system/bin/app_process64: malloc debug enabled
499 …09-10 01:03:50.070 557 557 I malloc_debug: /system/bin/audioserver: Run: 'kill -47 557' to dum…
752 08-16 15:54:16.060 26947 26947 I libc : /system/bin/app_process64: malloc debug enabled
|
| /bionic/libc/arch-x86_64/string/ |
| D | sse2-strcpy-slm.S | 66 #define JMPTBL(I, B) I - B argument
|
| D | sse4-memcmp-slm.S | 72 #define JMPTBL(I, B) (I - B) argument
|
| /bionic/ |
| D | README.md | 167 The first question you should ask is "should I add a libc wrapper for
|