Searched refs:nesting (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
203 // The last time this first became active (when nesting changed from 0 to 1)206 // The broadcast is active if nesting > 0.207 optional int32 nesting = 7; field243 // The last time this first became active (when nesting changed from 0 to 1)246 // The filter is active if nesting > 0.247 optional int32 nesting = 7; field
1695 int nesting; field in AlarmManagerService.FilterStats1711 + ", nesting=" + nesting in toString()1724 proto.write(FilterStatsProto.NESTING, nesting); in dumpDebug()1738 int nesting; field in AlarmManagerService.BroadcastStats1755 + ", nesting=" + nesting in toString()1768 proto.write(BroadcastStatsProto.NESTING, nesting); in dumpDebug()3412 if (fs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()3439 if (bs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()3457 if (fs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()5243 bs.nesting--; in updateStatsLocked()[all …]
90 // If the state change needs to count nesting. For example, given an exclusive_state field with
1249 final int nesting = mActivityStartingNesting.decrementAndGet(); in stopDeferPss() local1250 if (nesting <= 0) { in stopDeferPss()1253 + nesting); in stopDeferPss()1255 if (nesting < 0) { in stopDeferPss()1261 Slog.d(TAG_PSS, "Still deferring PSS, nesting=" + nesting); in stopDeferPss()
111 To avoid potential deadlocks, a strict locking order must be ensured whenever nesting locks. The
314 * Since nesting is not recommended, this will reveal for *multiple candidate providers*
1852 int nesting = ++ims.mBatchEditNesting; in beginBatchEdit() local1853 if (nesting == 1) { in beginBatchEdit()1876 int nesting = --ims.mBatchEditNesting; in endBatchEdit() local1877 if (nesting == 0) { in endBatchEdit()