Searched refs:nesting (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
565 int nesting; field in AlarmManagerService.FilterStats581 int nesting; field in AlarmManagerService.BroadcastStats982 if (fs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()1002 if (bs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()1017 if (fs.nesting > 0) pw.print("*ACTIVE* "); in dumpImpl()1645 if (bs.nesting == 0) { in deliverAlarmsLocked()1646 bs.nesting = 1; in deliverAlarmsLocked()1649 bs.nesting++; in deliverAlarmsLocked()1653 if (fs.nesting == 0) { in deliverAlarmsLocked()1654 fs.nesting = 1; in deliverAlarmsLocked()[all …]
123 public int nesting; field in AppOpsService.Op714 if (op.nesting == 0) { in startOperation()719 op.nesting++; in startOperation()748 if (op.nesting <= 1) { in finishOperationLocked()749 if (op.nesting == 1) { in finishOperationLocked()755 + " duration=" + op.duration + " nesting=" + op.nesting); in finishOperationLocked()757 op.nesting = 0; in finishOperationLocked()759 op.nesting--; in finishOperationLocked()
40 lead to an excessively deep view hierarchy. Furthermore, nesting several instances of {@link143 <li>Deep layouts - Layouts with too much nesting are bad for performance. Consider using flatter la…
1090 int nesting = ++ims.mBatchEditNesting; in beginBatchEdit() local1091 if (nesting == 1) { in beginBatchEdit()1113 int nesting = --ims.mBatchEditNesting; in endBatchEdit() local1114 if (nesting == 0) { in endBatchEdit()
339 track of the nesting depth.</li>
836 <p>You can create a group by nesting {@code <item>} elements inside a {@code <group>}