Searched refs:op (Results 1 – 13 of 13) sorted by relevance
86 op 00 nop 10x n none continue87 op 01 move 12x y none continue88 op 02 move/from16 22x y none continue89 op 03 move/16 32x y none continue90 op 04 move-wide 12x y none continue91 op 05 move-wide/from16 22x y none continue92 op 06 move-wide/16 32x y none continue93 op 07 move-object 12x y none continue94 op 08 move-object/from16 22x y none continue95 op 09 move-object/16 32x y none continue[all …]
357 function deriveOpcodeChains(i, op) {367 op = findNextOpcode(i);368 nextOpcode[i] = op;369 if (op != -1) {370 isFirst[op] = "false";401 function createPackedTables(i, op) {404 op = unpackOpcode(i);405 if (isUnused(op)) {406 packedName[i] = unusedName(op);407 packedConstName[i] = unusedConstName(op);[all …]
295 const char* dexGetOpcodeName(Opcode op) in dexGetOpcodeName() argument297 assert(op >= 0 && op < kNumPackedOpcodes); in dexGetOpcodeName()298 return gOpNames[op]; in dexGetOpcodeName()
622 const char* dexGetOpcodeName(Opcode op);
1 This is a sample no-op test, which does at least serve to verify that the
2 a bunch of switch op edge cases get converted reasonably.
2 both kinds of switch op get converted reasonably.
3 manipulation op translate reasonably.
737 private void updateReturnOp(Rop op, SourcePosition pos) { in updateReturnOp() argument738 if (op == null) { in updateReturnOp()747 returnOp = op; in updateReturnOp()750 if (returnOp != op) { in updateReturnOp()751 throw new SimException("return op mismatch: " + op + ", " + in updateReturnOp()
46 String op = insn.getOpcode().getName(); in listingString() local51 sb.append(op); in listingString()
56 String op = insn.getOpcode().getName(); in listingString() local61 sb.append(op); in listingString()
218 int op = insn.getOpcode().getOpcode(); in processInsn() local223 if (op == RegOps.MOVE_RESULT_PSEUDO && in processInsn()228 } else if (op == RegOps.MOVE_PARAM && in processInsn()234 } else if (op == RegOps.MOVE_RESULT && in processInsn()
158 ; Test every non-branching op.