Searched refs:reviewer (Results 1 – 14 of 14) sorted by relevance
/external/v8/tools/push-to-trunk/ |
D | common_includes.py | 541 if self._options.reviewer: 542 print "Using account %s for review." % self._options.reviewer 543 reviewer = self._options.reviewer 547 reviewer = self.ReadLine() 548 self.GitUpload(reviewer, self._options.author, self._options.force_upload, 580 self._options.reviewer = self["sheriff"]
|
D | auto_push.py | 116 "--reviewer", self._options.reviewer, 128 if not options.author or not options.reviewer: # pragma: no cover
|
D | auto_roll.py | 93 "--reviewer", self._options.reviewer, 114 if not options.reviewer:
|
D | chromium_roll.py | 79 (commit_title, sheriff, self._options.reviewer), 128 if not options.author or not options.reviewer:
|
D | git_recipes.py | 196 def GitUpload(self, reviewer="", author="", force=False, cq=False, argument 201 if reviewer: 202 args += ["-r", Quoted(reviewer)]
|
D | push_to_trunk.py | 414 if not options.manual and not options.reviewer:
|
/external/skia/site/dev/contrib/ |
D | submit.md | 71 ### Find a reviewer 73 Ideally, the reviewer is someone who is familiar with the area of code you are 99 Issue**. Enter at least one reviewer's email address and click **Update Issue**. 105 in the upper right. _Hint_: You can add -r reviewer@example.com --send-mail to 118 Code reviews are an important part of the engineering process. The reviewer will 124 You will likely get email back from the reviewer with comments. Fix these and 142 respect to each of their comments). When the reviewer is happy with your patch,
|
D | cqkeywords.md | 14 The CQ will run through its list of verifiers (reviewer check, trybots, tree check,
|
/external/regex-re2/lib/codereview/ |
D | codereview.py | 209 self.reviewer = [] 245 s += "Reviewer: " + JoinComma(cl.reviewer) + "\n" 270 s += "\tReviewer: " + JoinComma(cl.reviewer) + "\n" 293 reviewers=JoinComma(self.reviewer), cc=JoinComma(self.cc), 318 ("reviewers", JoinComma(self.reviewer)), 387 pmsg = "Hello " + JoinComma(self.reviewer) 457 cl.reviewer = SplitCommaSpace(sections['Reviewer']) 532 cl.reviewer = d.get('reviewers', []) 800 cl.reviewer = clx.reviewer 826 cl.reviewer = Add(cl.reviewer, SplitCommaSpace(opts.get('reviewer'))) [all …]
|
/external/google-breakpad/ |
D | README | 36 and select Publish+Mail, and enter in the code reviewer and CC
|
/external/google-breakpad/src/testing/gtest/scripts/ |
D | upload.py | 1306 for reviewer in options.reviewers.split(','): 1307 if "@" in reviewer and not reviewer.split("@")[1].count(".") == 1: 1308 ErrorExit("Invalid email address: %s" % reviewer)
|
/external/google-breakpad/src/testing/scripts/ |
D | upload.py | 1306 for reviewer in options.reviewers.split(','): 1307 if "@" in reviewer and not reviewer.split("@")[1].count(".") == 1: 1308 ErrorExit("Invalid email address: %s" % reviewer)
|
/external/llvm/docs/ |
D | Phabricator.rst | 52 reviewer understand your code.
|
D | DeveloperPolicy.rst | 80 When making a patch for review, the goal is to make it as easy for the reviewer 159 directly, or tell you who might be a good reviewer. 291 set right" will leave the reviewer wondering about which bits, and why they
|