Searched refs:generation (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
1 Test code generation for field accesses.
1 Test loop formation heuristics and code generation. Basically the problem to
885 int generation = 0; in AssembleLIR() local889 generation ^= 1; in AssembleLIR()899 lir->flags.generation = generation; in AssembleLIR()910 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()934 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()966 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()990 new_lir->flags.generation = generation; in AssembleLIR()1008 CodeOffset target_offs = ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? in AssembleLIR()
1254 int generation = 0; in AssembleLIR() local1258 generation ^= 1; in AssembleLIR()1272 lir->flags.generation = generation; in AssembleLIR()1292 ((lir_target->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()1372 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()1418 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()1435 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()1452 ((target_lir->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : offset_adjustment); in AssembleLIR()1510 : target->offset + ((target->flags.generation == lir->flags.generation) ? 0 : in AssembleLIR()
17 code generation for switch tables, fill array data, 64-bit54 for Arm and x86. It might make sense to replace the inline code generation
179 unsigned int generation:1; // Used to track visitation state during fixup pass. member