Lines Matching refs:hardcode_direct

1109   _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
2170   if test no != "$_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)" &&
4954   _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5162       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5320       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5353 	_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5423       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5432 	_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5449 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
5640       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5647       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5656       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5668       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5685 	_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5733 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5737 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5804       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5810       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5821 	_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5948       _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
5957 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes # is this really true???
5964 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
5968 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no #Motorola manual says yes, but my tests say they lie
6149 _LT_TAGDECL([], [hardcode_direct], [0],
6305 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6494         _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6503           _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6520 	    _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=unsupported
6778         _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6826             _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
6830             _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
6889 	_LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7100 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7113 	  _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=yes
7667 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no
7803 _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_direct, $1)=no