Searched refs:reviewers (Results 1 – 11 of 11) sorted by relevance
69 * Add reviewers and mailing113 reviewers, the ``Differential Revision``, etc from the review and commit it to the repository.142 the review so that reviewers don't think it is still open. In the web UI,
116 a file inline, making it difficult to work with for reviewers using that164 Developers should participate in code reviews as both reviewers and192 Note that code ownership is completely different than reviewers: anyone can
50 Many thanks to the reviewers at Sun and Vitria who gave feedback on early
167 Go to the url from the output of "repo upload" and add reviewers.
293 reviewers=JoinComma(self.reviewer), cc=JoinComma(self.cc),2001 PostMessage(ui, cl.name, pmsg, reviewers="", cc=JoinComma(cl.reviewer+cl.cc))2512 def EditDesc(issue, subject=None, desc=None, reviewers=None, cc=None, closed=False, private=False): argument2519 if reviewers is not None:2520 form_fields['reviewers'] = reviewers2533 def PostMessage(ui, issue, message, reviewers=None, cc=None, send_mail=True, subject=None): argument2536 if reviewers is not None:2537 form_fields['reviewers'] = reviewers2549 if reviewers is not None or cc is not None:2594 upload_options.reviewers = None
1305 if options.reviewers:1306 for reviewer in options.reviewers.split(','):1309 form_fields.append(("reviewers", options.reviewers))
118 maintainers (Sameer Agarwal, Keir Mierle, or Alex Stewart) as reviewers.
2276 if options.reviewers:2277 for reviewer in options.reviewers.split(','):2279 form_fields.append(("reviewers", options.reviewers))
154 _Note_: As you work through the review process, both you and your reviewers
META-INF/ META-INF/MANIFEST.MF default.xsl edu/ edu/umd ...