| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/gold/ |
| D | archive.cc | 58 std::string* why, char** tmpbufp, in should_include_member() argument
118 *why = "-u "; in should_include_member()
119 *why += sym_name; in should_include_member()
125 *why = "--export-dynamic-symbol "; in should_include_member()
126 *why += sym_name; in should_include_member()
136 *why = buf; in should_include_member()
143 *why = "entry symbol "; in should_include_member()
144 *why += sym_name; in should_include_member()
799 std::string why; in add_symbols() local
802 &why, &tmpbuf, &tmpbuflen); in add_symbols()
[all …]
|
| D | mapfile.h | 66 const Symbol* sym, const char* why);
|
| D | mapfile.cc | 109 const Symbol* sym, const char* why) in report_include_archive_member() argument
125 fprintf(this->map_file_, "%s", why); in report_include_archive_member()
|
| D | archive.h | 100 Symbol** symp, std::string* why, char** tmpbufp,
337 Mapfile*, Symbol*, const char* why);
|
| D | object.h | 602 Read_symbols_data* sd, std::string* why) in should_include_member() argument
603 { return this->do_should_include_member(symtab, layout, sd, why); } in should_include_member()
825 std::string* why) = 0;
2279 std::string* why);
|
| D | plugin.h | 483 std::string* why);
|
| D | dynobj.h | 187 std::string* why);
|
| D | plugin.cc | 1150 std::string* why) in do_should_include_member() argument
1163 &symbol, why, in do_should_include_member()
|
| D | incremental.h | 1891 std::string* why);
2097 std::string* why);
|
| D | object.cc | 1983 std::string* why) in do_should_include_member() argument
2010 &symbol, why, in do_should_include_member()
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ |
| D | flags1.d | 11 # (There is no good reason why they have to be).
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/gas/testsuite/gas/d30v/ |
| D | bittest.s | 5 # generate warnings. The reason why this is not an error is that those instructions
|
| D | bittest.l | 14 …5 # generate warnings. The reason why this is not an error is that those instruction…
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/include/nlm/ |
| D | ChangeLog | 30 why CONCAT4 can't be used.
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/gprof/ |
| D | TODO | 64 specified; find out why
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/binutils/ |
| D | ChangeLog-2005 | 122 (demangle_it): Add a comment describing why _ and $ prefixes are
130 Document why demangling names on the command line is slightly
1057 associated with it. Improve comment explaining why the use of
|
| D | ChangeLog-2013 | 125 (main): Add comment explaining why a break statement is not
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/ |
| D | COPYING.LIBGLOSS | 324 This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/ld/emultempl/ |
| D | pe.em | 72 /* FIXME: See bfd/peXXigen.c for why we include an architecture specific
176 # See also the mail thread starting here for the reason why
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/bfd/ |
| D | config.bfd | 36 # stripped or not. That is why we set targ_underscore. c++filt uses
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/opcodes/ |
| D | ChangeLog-2008 | 199 Add a comment explaining why.
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/ld/ |
| D | ldint.texinfo | 689 The answer is why not, prohibiting that (detecting violation) would
|
| D | ChangeLog-2006 | 762 * emultempl/mmo.em: Improve comments. Explain why there's
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/config/ |
| D | tcl.m4 | 2140 dnl or why it was needed was needed. In any event, this sort of
2389 # set and why.
|
| /toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.25/gas/ |
| D | COPYING | 674 <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html>.
|