Lines Matching refs:discovered
203 discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM fuzzer.
211 overflow. This bug was discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM fuzzer.
226 provoke a buffer overflow. This bug was discovered by Karl Skomski with the
235 first of these bugs was discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM fuzzer.
249 diagnostic. This bug was discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM fuzzer.
254 This bug was discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM fuzzer.
278 (?(R<digits>). This omission was discovered by Karl Skomski with the LLVM
580 error. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
588 discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
598 optimization. This infelicity was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
604 compile the pattern, leading to a buffer overflow. This bug was discovered by
609 discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
613 to buffer overflow or other errors. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
618 discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
622 incorrectly compiled and could trigger buffer overflow. This bug was discovered
627 This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
635 lookbehind assertion. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
647 where backtracking after \C could crash. This set of bugs was discovered by the
653 been implemented. This infelicity was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
659 working properly in 16-bit and 32-bit modes. This issue was discovered by a
674 error. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
679 discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
683 bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
687 This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
691 buffer overflow at compile time. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
700 provoke a buffer overflow. This bug was discovered by the LLVM fuzzer.
854 This bug was reported as "heap overflow", discovered by Kai Lu of Fortinet's
860 discovered by Kai Lu of Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs. (Added 24-March-2015: