/* * Copyright (c) 2017 Richard Palethorpe * * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program. If not, see . */ /* * A basic regression test for tst_atomic_{load,store}. Also provides a * limited check that atomic stores and loads order non-atomic memory * accesses. That is, we are checking that they implement memory fences or * barriers. * * Many architectures/machines will still pass the test even if you remove the * atomic functions. X86 in particular has strong memory ordering by default * so that should always pass (if you use volatile). However Aarch64 * (Raspberry Pi 3 Model B) has been observed to fail without the atomic * functions. * * A failure can occur if an update to seq_n is not made globally visible by * the time the next thread needs to use it. */ #include #include #include "tst_test.h" #include "tst_atomic.h" #define THREADS 64 #define FILLER (1 << 20) /* Uncomment these to see what happens without atomics. To prevent the compiler * from removing/reording atomic and seq_n, mark them as volatile. */ /* #define tst_atomic_load(v) (*(v)) */ /* #define tst_atomic_store(i, v) *(v) = (i) */ struct block { int seq_n; intptr_t id; intptr_t filler[FILLER]; }; static int atomic; /* Instead of storing seq_n on the stack (probably next to the atomic variable * above), we store it in the middle of some anonymous mapped memory and keep * a pointer to it. This should decrease the probability that the value of * seq_n will be synchronised between processors as a byproduct of the atomic * variable being updated. */ static int *seq_n; static struct block *m; static void *worker_load_store(void *aid) { int id = (intptr_t)aid, i; for (i = tst_atomic_load(&atomic); i != id; i = tst_atomic_load(&atomic)) ; (m + (*seq_n))->id = id; *seq_n += 1; tst_atomic_store(i + 1, &atomic); return NULL; } /* Attempt to stress the memory transport so that memory operations are * contended and less predictable. This should increase the likelyhood of a * failure if a memory fence is missing. */ static void *mem_spam(void *vp LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) { intptr_t i = 0, j; struct block *cur = m; tst_res(TINFO, "Memory spammer started"); while (tst_atomic_load(&atomic) > 0) { for (j = 0; j < FILLER; j++) cur->filler[j] = j; if (i < THREADS - 1) { cur = m + (++i); } else { i = 0; cur = m; } } return NULL; } static void do_test(void) { intptr_t i, id; pthread_t threads[THREADS + 1]; atomic = 0; m = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, sizeof(*m) * THREADS, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); seq_n = &((m + THREADS / 2)->seq_n); pthread_create(&threads[THREADS], NULL, mem_spam, NULL); for (i = THREADS - 1; i >= 0; i--) pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, worker_load_store, (void *)i); for (i = 0; i < THREADS; i++) { tst_res(TINFO, "Joining thread %li", i); pthread_join(threads[i], NULL); } tst_atomic_store(-1, &atomic); pthread_join(threads[THREADS], NULL); tst_res(TINFO, "Expected\tFound"); for (i = 0; i < THREADS; i++) { id = (m + i)->id; if (id != i) tst_res(TFAIL, "%d\t\t%d", (int)i, (int)id); else tst_res(TPASS, "%d\t\t%d", (int)i, (int)id); } SAFE_MUNMAP(m, sizeof(*m) * THREADS); } static struct tst_test test = { .test_all = do_test, };