Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:deep (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance

/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/libiberty/
Dalloca.c146 char *deep; /* For stack depth measure. */ member
179 if ((STACK_DIR > 0 && hp->h.deep > depth) in C_alloca()
180 || (STACK_DIR < 0 && hp->h.deep < depth)) in C_alloca()
207 ((header *) new_storage)->h.deep = depth; in C_alloca()
/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/zlib/win32/
DDLL_FAQ.txt164 The roots of the problem reside deep inside the unsafety of
/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/binutils/po/
Dbinutils.pot5261 msgid "Archive nesting is too deep"
9487 msgid "Resources nest too deep"
/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/libiberty/testsuite/
Ddemangle-expected3795 # correctly, I believe that we have to understand that the J37J deep
/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/texinfo/
Dtexinfo.tex1664 % correspondingly. There is no deep meaning behind these magic numbers
/toolchain/binutils/binutils-2.27/ld/
Dld.texinfo3286 10 levels deep.