1============== 2LTO Visibility 3============== 4 5*LTO visibility* is a property of an entity that specifies whether it can be 6referenced from outside the current LTO unit. A *linkage unit* is a set of 7translation units linked together into an executable or DSO, and a linkage 8unit's *LTO unit* is the subset of the linkage unit that is linked together 9using link-time optimization; in the case where LTO is not being used, the 10linkage unit's LTO unit is empty. Each linkage unit has only a single LTO unit. 11 12The LTO visibility of a class is used by the compiler to determine which 13classes the whole-program devirtualization (``-fwhole-program-vtables``) and 14control flow integrity (``-fsanitize=cfi-vcall`` and ``-fsanitize=cfi-mfcall``) 15features apply to. These features use whole-program information, so they 16require the entire class hierarchy to be visible in order to work correctly. 17 18If any translation unit in the program uses either of the whole-program 19devirtualization or control flow integrity features, it is effectively an ODR 20violation to define a class with hidden LTO visibility in multiple linkage 21units. A class with public LTO visibility may be defined in multiple linkage 22units, but the tradeoff is that the whole-program devirtualization and 23control flow integrity features can only be applied to classes with hidden LTO 24visibility. A class's LTO visibility is treated as an ODR-relevant property 25of its definition, so it must be consistent between translation units. 26 27In translation units built with LTO, LTO visibility is based on the 28class's symbol visibility as expressed at the source level (i.e. the 29``__attribute__((visibility("...")))`` attribute, or the ``-fvisibility=`` 30flag) or, on the Windows platform, the dllimport and dllexport attributes. When 31targeting non-Windows platforms, classes with a visibility other than hidden 32visibility receive public LTO visibility. When targeting Windows, classes 33with dllimport or dllexport attributes receive public LTO visibility. All 34other classes receive hidden LTO visibility. Classes with internal linkage 35(e.g. classes declared in unnamed namespaces) also receive hidden LTO 36visibility. 37 38During the LTO link, all classes with public LTO visibility will be refined 39to hidden LTO visibility when the ``--lto-whole-program-visibility`` lld linker 40option is applied (``-plugin-opt=whole-program-visibility`` for gold). This flag 41can be used to defer specifying whether classes have hidden LTO visibility until 42link time, to allow bitcode objects to be shared by different LTO links. 43Due to an implementation limitation, symbols associated with classes with hidden 44LTO visibility may still be exported from the binary when using this flag. It is 45unsafe to refer to these symbols, and their visibility may be relaxed to hidden 46in a future compiler release. 47 48A class defined in a translation unit built without LTO receives public 49LTO visibility regardless of its object file visibility, linkage or other 50attributes. 51 52This mechanism will produce the correct result in most cases, but there are 53two cases where it may wrongly infer hidden LTO visibility. 54 551. As a corollary of the above rules, if a linkage unit is produced from a 56 combination of LTO object files and non-LTO object files, any hidden 57 visibility class defined in both a translation unit built with LTO and 58 a translation unit built without LTO must be defined with public LTO 59 visibility in order to avoid an ODR violation. 60 612. Some ABIs provide the ability to define an abstract base class without 62 visibility attributes in multiple linkage units and have virtual calls 63 to derived classes in other linkage units work correctly. One example of 64 this is COM on Windows platforms. If the ABI allows this, any base class 65 used in this way must be defined with public LTO visibility. 66 67Classes that fall into either of these categories can be marked up with the 68``[[clang::lto_visibility_public]]`` attribute. To specifically handle the 69COM case, classes with the ``__declspec(uuid())`` attribute receive public 70LTO visibility. On Windows platforms, clang-cl's ``/MT`` and ``/MTd`` 71flags statically link the program against a prebuilt standard library; 72these flags imply public LTO visibility for every class declared in the 73``std`` and ``stdext`` namespaces. 74 75Example 76======= 77 78The following example shows how LTO visibility works in practice in several 79cases involving two linkage units, ``main`` and ``dso.so``. 80 81.. code-block:: none 82 83 +-----------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------------------+ 84 | main (clang++ -fvisibility=hidden): | | dso.so (clang++ -fvisibility=hidden): | 85 | | | | 86 | +-----------------------------------------------------+ | | struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C { | 87 | | LTO unit (clang++ -fvisibility=hidden -flto): | | | virtual void f(); | 88 | | | | | } | 89 | | struct A { ... }; | | | void C::f() {} | 90 | | struct [[clang::lto_visibility_public]] B { ... }; | | | struct D { | 91 | | struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C { | | | virtual void g() = 0; | 92 | | virtual void f(); | | | }; | 93 | | }; | | | struct E : D { | 94 | | struct [[clang::lto_visibility_public]] D { | | | virtual void g() { ... } | 95 | | virtual void g() = 0; | | | }; | 96 | | }; | | | __attribute__((visibility("default"))) D *mkE() { | 97 | | | | | return new E; | 98 | +-----------------------------------------------------+ | | } | 99 | | | | 100 | struct B { ... }; | +----------------------------------------------------+ 101 | | 102 +-----------------------------------------------------------+ 103 104We will now describe the LTO visibility of each of the classes defined in 105these linkage units. 106 107Class ``A`` is not defined outside of ``main``'s LTO unit, so it can have 108hidden LTO visibility. This is inferred from the object file visibility 109specified on the command line. 110 111Class ``B`` is defined in ``main``, both inside and outside its LTO unit. The 112definition outside the LTO unit has public LTO visibility, so the definition 113inside the LTO unit must also have public LTO visibility in order to avoid 114an ODR violation. 115 116Class ``C`` is defined in both ``main`` and ``dso.so`` and therefore must 117have public LTO visibility. This is correctly inferred from the ``visibility`` 118attribute. 119 120Class ``D`` is an abstract base class with a derived class ``E`` defined 121in ``dso.so``. This is an example of the COM scenario; the definition of 122``D`` in ``main``'s LTO unit must have public LTO visibility in order to be 123compatible with the definition of ``D`` in ``dso.so``, which is observable 124by calling the function ``mkE``. 125