1=====================================
2Garbage Collection Safepoints in LLVM
3=====================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7   :depth: 2
8
9Status
10=======
11
12This document describes a set of experimental extensions to LLVM. Use
13with caution.  Because the intrinsics have experimental status,
14compatibility across LLVM releases is not guaranteed.
15
16LLVM currently supports an alternate mechanism for conservative
17garbage collection support using the ``gcroot`` intrinsic.  The mechanism
18described here shares little in common with the alternate ``gcroot``
19implementation and it is hoped that this mechanism will eventually
20replace the gc_root mechanism.
21
22Overview
23========
24
25To collect dead objects, garbage collectors must be able to identify
26any references to objects contained within executing code, and,
27depending on the collector, potentially update them.  The collector
28does not need this information at all points in code - that would make
29the problem much harder - but only at well-defined points in the
30execution known as 'safepoints' For most collectors, it is sufficient
31to track at least one copy of each unique pointer value.  However, for
32a collector which wishes to relocate objects directly reachable from
33running code, a higher standard is required.
34
35One additional challenge is that the compiler may compute intermediate
36results ("derived pointers") which point outside of the allocation or
37even into the middle of another allocation.  The eventual use of this
38intermediate value must yield an address within the bounds of the
39allocation, but such "exterior derived pointers" may be visible to the
40collector.  Given this, a garbage collector can not safely rely on the
41runtime value of an address to indicate the object it is associated
42with.  If the garbage collector wishes to move any object, the
43compiler must provide a mapping, for each pointer, to an indication of
44its allocation.
45
46To simplify the interaction between a collector and the compiled code,
47most garbage collectors are organized in terms of three abstractions:
48load barriers, store barriers, and safepoints.
49
50#. A load barrier is a bit of code executed immediately after the
51   machine load instruction, but before any use of the value loaded.
52   Depending on the collector, such a barrier may be needed for all
53   loads, merely loads of a particular type (in the original source
54   language), or none at all.
55
56#. Analogously, a store barrier is a code fragment that runs
57   immediately before the machine store instruction, but after the
58   computation of the value stored.  The most common use of a store
59   barrier is to update a 'card table' in a generational garbage
60   collector.
61
62#. A safepoint is a location at which pointers visible to the compiled
63   code (i.e. currently in registers or on the stack) are allowed to
64   change.  After the safepoint completes, the actual pointer value
65   may differ, but the 'object' (as seen by the source language)
66   pointed to will not.
67
68  Note that the term 'safepoint' is somewhat overloaded.  It refers to
69  both the location at which the machine state is parsable and the
70  coordination protocol involved in bring application threads to a
71  point at which the collector can safely use that information.  The
72  term "statepoint" as used in this document refers exclusively to the
73  former.
74
75This document focuses on the last item - compiler support for
76safepoints in generated code.  We will assume that an outside
77mechanism has decided where to place safepoints.  From our
78perspective, all safepoints will be function calls.  To support
79relocation of objects directly reachable from values in compiled code,
80the collector must be able to:
81
82#. identify every copy of a pointer (including copies introduced by
83   the compiler itself) at the safepoint,
84#. identify which object each pointer relates to, and
85#. potentially update each of those copies.
86
87This document describes the mechanism by which an LLVM based compiler
88can provide this information to a language runtime/collector, and
89ensure that all pointers can be read and updated if desired.  The
90heart of the approach is to construct (or rewrite) the IR in a manner
91where the possible updates performed by the garbage collector are
92explicitly visible in the IR.  Doing so requires that we:
93
94#. create a new SSA value for each potentially relocated pointer, and
95   ensure that no uses of the original (non relocated) value is
96   reachable after the safepoint,
97#. specify the relocation in a way which is opaque to the compiler to
98   ensure that the optimizer can not introduce new uses of an
99   unrelocated value after a statepoint. This prevents the optimizer
100   from performing unsound optimizations.
101#. recording a mapping of live pointers (and the allocation they're
102   associated with) for each statepoint.
103
104At the most abstract level, inserting a safepoint can be thought of as
105replacing a call instruction with a call to a multiple return value
106function which both calls the original target of the call, returns
107it's result, and returns updated values for any live pointers to
108garbage collected objects.
109
110  Note that the task of identifying all live pointers to garbage
111  collected values, transforming the IR to expose a pointer giving the
112  base object for every such live pointer, and inserting all the
113  intrinsics correctly is explicitly out of scope for this document.
114  The recommended approach is to use the :ref:`utility passes
115  <statepoint-utilities>` described below.
116
117This abstract function call is concretely represented by a sequence of
118intrinsic calls known collectively as a "statepoint relocation sequence".
119
120Let's consider a simple call in LLVM IR:
121
122.. code-block:: llvm
123
124  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
125         gc "statepoint-example" {
126    call void ()* @foo()
127    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj
128  }
129
130Depending on our language we may need to allow a safepoint during the execution
131of ``foo``. If so, we need to let the collector update local values in the
132current frame.  If we don't, we'll be accessing a potential invalid reference
133once we eventually return from the call.
134
135In this example, we need to relocate the SSA value ``%obj``.  Since we can't
136actually change the value in the SSA value ``%obj``, we need to introduce a new
137SSA value ``%obj.relocated`` which represents the potentially changed value of
138``%obj`` after the safepoint and update any following uses appropriately.  The
139resulting relocation sequence is:
140
141.. code-block:: llvm
142
143  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
144         gc "statepoint-example" {
145    %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
146    %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 7, i32 7)
147    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
148  }
149
150Ideally, this sequence would have been represented as a M argument, N
151return value function (where M is the number of values being
152relocated + the original call arguments and N is the original return
153value + each relocated value), but LLVM does not easily support such a
154representation.
155
156Instead, the statepoint intrinsic marks the actual site of the
157safepoint or statepoint.  The statepoint returns a token value (which
158exists only at compile time).  To get back the original return value
159of the call, we use the ``gc.result`` intrinsic.  To get the relocation
160of each pointer in turn, we use the ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic with the
161appropriate index.  Note that both the ``gc.relocate`` and ``gc.result`` are
162tied to the statepoint.  The combination forms a "statepoint relocation
163sequence" and represents the entirety of a parseable call or 'statepoint'.
164
165When lowered, this example would generate the following x86 assembly:
166
167.. code-block:: gas
168
169	  .globl	test1
170	  .align	16, 0x90
171	  pushq	%rax
172	  callq	foo
173  .Ltmp1:
174	  movq	(%rsp), %rax  # This load is redundant (oops!)
175	  popq	%rdx
176	  retq
177
178Each of the potentially relocated values has been spilled to the
179stack, and a record of that location has been recorded to the
180:ref:`Stack Map section <stackmap-section>`.  If the garbage collector
181needs to update any of these pointers during the call, it knows
182exactly what to change.
183
184The relevant parts of the StackMap section for our example are:
185
186.. code-block:: gas
187
188  # This describes the call site
189  # Stack Maps: callsite 2882400000
190	  .quad	2882400000
191	  .long	.Ltmp1-test1
192	  .short	0
193  # .. 8 entries skipped ..
194  # This entry describes the spill slot which is directly addressable
195  # off RSP with offset 0.  Given the value was spilled with a pushq,
196  # that makes sense.
197  # Stack Maps:   Loc 8: Direct RSP     [encoding: .byte 2, .byte 8, .short 7, .int 0]
198	  .byte	2
199	  .byte	8
200	  .short	7
201	  .long	0
202
203This example was taken from the tests for the :ref:`RewriteStatepointsForGC` utility pass.  As such, it's full StackMap can be easily examined with the following command.
204
205.. code-block:: bash
206
207  opt -rewrite-statepoints-for-gc test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/basics.ll -S | llc -debug-only=stackmaps
208
209Base & Derived Pointers
210^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
211
212A "base pointer" is one which points to the starting address of an allocation
213(object).  A "derived pointer" is one which is offset from a base pointer by
214some amount.  When relocating objects, a garbage collector needs to be able
215to relocate each derived pointer associated with an allocation to the same
216offset from the new address.
217
218"Interior derived pointers" remain within the bounds of the allocation
219they're associated with.  As a result, the base object can be found at
220runtime provided the bounds of allocations are known to the runtime system.
221
222"Exterior derived pointers" are outside the bounds of the associated object;
223they may even fall within *another* allocations address range.  As a result,
224there is no way for a garbage collector to determine which allocation they
225are associated with at runtime and compiler support is needed.
226
227The ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic supports an explicit operand for describing the
228allocation associated with a derived pointer.  This operand is frequently
229referred to as the base operand, but does not strictly speaking have to be
230a base pointer, but it does need to lie within the bounds of the associated
231allocation.  Some collectors may require that the operand be an actual base
232pointer rather than merely an internal derived pointer. Note that during
233lowering both the base and derived pointer operands are required to be live
234over the associated call safepoint even if the base is otherwise unused
235afterwards.
236
237If we extend our previous example to include a pointless derived pointer,
238we get:
239
240.. code-block:: llvm
241
242  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
243         gc "statepoint-example" {
244    %gep = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i64 20000
245    %token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep)
246    %obj.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %token, i32 7, i32 7)
247    %gep.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %token, i32 7, i32 8)
248    %p = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep, i64 -20000
249    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %p
250  }
251
252Note that in this example %p and %obj.relocate are the same address and we
253could replace one with the other, potentially removing the derived pointer
254from the live set at the safepoint entirely.
255
256GC Transitions
257^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
258
259As a practical consideration, many garbage-collected systems allow code that is
260collector-aware ("managed code") to call code that is not collector-aware
261("unmanaged code"). It is common that such calls must also be safepoints, since
262it is desirable to allow the collector to run during the execution of
263unmanaged code. Futhermore, it is common that coordinating the transition from
264managed to unmanaged code requires extra code generation at the call site to
265inform the collector of the transition. In order to support these needs, a
266statepoint may be marked as a GC transition, and data that is necessary to
267perform the transition (if any) may be provided as additional arguments to the
268statepoint.
269
270  Note that although in many cases statepoints may be inferred to be GC
271  transitions based on the function symbols involved (e.g. a call from a
272  function with GC strategy "foo" to a function with GC strategy "bar"),
273  indirect calls that are also GC transitions must also be supported. This
274  requirement is the driving force behind the decision to require that GC
275  transitions are explicitly marked.
276
277Let's revisit the sample given above, this time treating the call to ``@foo``
278as a GC transition. Depending on our target, the transition code may need to
279access some extra state in order to inform the collector of the transition.
280Let's assume a hypothetical GC--somewhat unimaginatively named "hypothetical-gc"
281--that requires that a TLS variable must be written to before and after a call
282to unmanaged code. The resulting relocation sequence is:
283
284.. code-block:: llvm
285
286  @flag = thread_local global i32 0, align 4
287
288  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1) *%obj)
289         gc "hypothetical-gc" {
290
291    %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 1, i32* @Flag, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
292    %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 7, i32 7)
293    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
294  }
295
296During lowering, this will result in a instruction selection DAG that looks
297something like:
298
299::
300
301  CALLSEQ_START
302  ...
303  GC_TRANSITION_START (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32* Flag
304  STATEPOINT
305  GC_TRANSITION_END (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32 *Flag
306  ...
307  CALLSEQ_END
308
309In order to generate the necessary transition code, the backend for each target
310supported by "hypothetical-gc" must be modified to lower ``GC_TRANSITION_START``
311and ``GC_TRANSITION_END`` nodes appropriately when the "hypothetical-gc"
312strategy is in use for a particular function. Assuming that such lowering has
313been added for X86, the generated assembly would be:
314
315.. code-block:: gas
316
317	  .globl	test1
318	  .align	16, 0x90
319	  pushq	%rax
320	  movl $1, %fs:Flag@TPOFF
321	  callq	foo
322	  movl $0, %fs:Flag@TPOFF
323  .Ltmp1:
324	  movq	(%rsp), %rax  # This load is redundant (oops!)
325	  popq	%rdx
326	  retq
327
328Note that the design as presented above is not fully implemented: in particular,
329strategy-specific lowering is not present, and all GC transitions are emitted as
330as single no-op before and after the call instruction. These no-ops are often
331removed by the backend during dead machine instruction elimination.
332
333
334Intrinsics
335===========
336
337'llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint' Intrinsic
338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
339
340Syntax:
341"""""""
342
343::
344
345      declare i32
346        @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(i64 <id>, i32 <num patch bytes>,
347                       func_type <target>,
348                       i64 <#call args>, i64 <flags>,
349                       ... (call parameters),
350                       i64 <# transition args>, ... (transition parameters),
351                       i64 <# deopt args>, ... (deopt parameters),
352                       ... (gc parameters))
353
354Overview:
355"""""""""
356
357The statepoint intrinsic represents a call which is parse-able by the
358runtime.
359
360Operands:
361"""""""""
362
363The 'id' operand is a constant integer that is reported as the ID
364field in the generated stackmap.  LLVM does not interpret this
365parameter in any way and its meaning is up to the statepoint user to
366decide.  Note that LLVM is free to duplicate code containing
367statepoint calls, and this may transform IR that had a unique 'id' per
368lexical call to statepoint to IR that does not.
369
370If 'num patch bytes' is non-zero then the call instruction
371corresponding to the statepoint is not emitted and LLVM emits 'num
372patch bytes' bytes of nops in its place.  LLVM will emit code to
373prepare the function arguments and retrieve the function return value
374in accordance to the calling convention; the former before the nop
375sequence and the latter after the nop sequence.  It is expected that
376the user will patch over the 'num patch bytes' bytes of nops with a
377calling sequence specific to their runtime before executing the
378generated machine code.  There are no guarantees with respect to the
379alignment of the nop sequence.  Unlike :doc:`StackMaps` statepoints do
380not have a concept of shadow bytes.  Note that semantically the
381statepoint still represents a call or invoke to 'target', and the nop
382sequence after patching is expected to represent an operation
383equivalent to a call or invoke to 'target'.
384
385The 'target' operand is the function actually being called.  The
386target can be specified as either a symbolic LLVM function, or as an
387arbitrary Value of appropriate function type.  Note that the function
388type must match the signature of the callee and the types of the 'call
389parameters' arguments.
390
391The '#call args' operand is the number of arguments to the actual
392call.  It must exactly match the number of arguments passed in the
393'call parameters' variable length section.
394
395The 'flags' operand is used to specify extra information about the
396statepoint. This is currently only used to mark certain statepoints
397as GC transitions. This operand is a 64-bit integer with the following
398layout, where bit 0 is the least significant bit:
399
400  +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
401  | Bit # | Usage                                             |
402  +=======+===================================================+
403  |     0 | Set if the statepoint is a GC transition, cleared |
404  |       | otherwise.                                        |
405  +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
406  |  1-63 | Reserved for future use; must be cleared.         |
407  +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
408
409The 'call parameters' arguments are simply the arguments which need to
410be passed to the call target.  They will be lowered according to the
411specified calling convention and otherwise handled like a normal call
412instruction.  The number of arguments must exactly match what is
413specified in '# call args'.  The types must match the signature of
414'target'.
415
416The 'transition parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of
417Values which need to be passed to GC transition code. They will be
418lowered and passed as operands to the appropriate GC_TRANSITION nodes
419in the selection DAG. It is assumed that these arguments must be
420available before and after (but not necessarily during) the execution
421of the callee. The '# transition args' field indicates how many operands
422are to be interpreted as 'transition parameters'.
423
424The 'deopt parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of Values
425which is meaningful to the runtime.  The runtime may read any of these
426values, but is assumed not to modify them.  If the garbage collector
427might need to modify one of these values, it must also be listed in
428the 'gc pointer' argument list.  The '# deopt args' field indicates
429how many operands are to be interpreted as 'deopt parameters'.
430
431The 'gc parameters' arguments contain every pointer to a garbage
432collector object which potentially needs to be updated by the garbage
433collector.  Note that the argument list must explicitly contain a base
434pointer for every derived pointer listed.  The order of arguments is
435unimportant.  Unlike the other variable length parameter sets, this
436list is not length prefixed.
437
438Semantics:
439""""""""""
440
441A statepoint is assumed to read and write all memory.  As a result,
442memory operations can not be reordered past a statepoint.  It is
443illegal to mark a statepoint as being either 'readonly' or 'readnone'.
444
445Note that legal IR can not perform any memory operation on a 'gc
446pointer' argument of the statepoint in a location statically reachable
447from the statepoint.  Instead, the explicitly relocated value (from a
448``gc.relocate``) must be used.
449
450'llvm.experimental.gc.result' Intrinsic
451^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
452
453Syntax:
454"""""""
455
456::
457
458      declare type*
459        @llvm.experimental.gc.result(i32 %statepoint_token)
460
461Overview:
462"""""""""
463
464``gc.result`` extracts the result of the original call instruction
465which was replaced by the ``gc.statepoint``.  The ``gc.result``
466intrinsic is actually a family of three intrinsics due to an
467implementation limitation.  Other than the type of the return value,
468the semantics are the same.
469
470Operands:
471"""""""""
472
473The first and only argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts
474the safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.result`` is a part.
475Despite the typing of this as a generic i32, *only* the value defined
476by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here.
477
478Semantics:
479""""""""""
480
481The ``gc.result`` represents the return value of the call target of
482the ``statepoint``.  The type of the ``gc.result`` must exactly match
483the type of the target.  If the call target returns void, there will
484be no ``gc.result``.
485
486A ``gc.result`` is modeled as a 'readnone' pure function.  It has no
487side effects since it is just a projection of the return value of the
488previous call represented by the ``gc.statepoint``.
489
490'llvm.experimental.gc.relocate' Intrinsic
491^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
492
493Syntax:
494"""""""
495
496::
497
498      declare <pointer type>
499        @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate(i32 %statepoint_token,
500                                       i32 %base_offset,
501                                       i32 %pointer_offset)
502
503Overview:
504"""""""""
505
506A ``gc.relocate`` returns the potentially relocated value of a pointer
507at the safepoint.
508
509Operands:
510"""""""""
511
512The first argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts the
513safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.relocation`` is a part.
514Despite the typing of this as a generic i32, *only* the value defined
515by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here.
516
517The second argument is an index into the statepoints list of arguments
518which specifies the allocation for the pointer being relocated.
519This index must land within the 'gc parameter' section of the
520statepoint's argument list.  The associated value must be within the
521object with which the pointer being relocated is associated. The optimizer
522is free to change *which* interior derived pointer is reported, provided that
523it does not replace an actual base pointer with another interior derived
524pointer.  Collectors are allowed to rely on the base pointer operand
525remaining an actual base pointer if so constructed.
526
527The third argument is an index into the statepoint's list of arguments
528which specify the (potentially) derived pointer being relocated.  It
529is legal for this index to be the same as the second argument
530if-and-only-if a base pointer is being relocated. This index must land
531within the 'gc parameter' section of the statepoint's argument list.
532
533Semantics:
534""""""""""
535
536The return value of ``gc.relocate`` is the potentially relocated value
537of the pointer specified by it's arguments.  It is unspecified how the
538value of the returned pointer relates to the argument to the
539``gc.statepoint`` other than that a) it points to the same source
540language object with the same offset, and b) the 'based-on'
541relationship of the newly relocated pointers is a projection of the
542unrelocated pointers.  In particular, the integer value of the pointer
543returned is unspecified.
544
545A ``gc.relocate`` is modeled as a ``readnone`` pure function.  It has no
546side effects since it is just a way to extract information about work
547done during the actual call modeled by the ``gc.statepoint``.
548
549.. _statepoint-stackmap-format:
550
551Stack Map Format
552================
553
554Locations for each pointer value which may need read and/or updated by
555the runtime or collector are provided via the :ref:`Stack Map format
556<stackmap-format>` specified in the PatchPoint documentation.
557
558Each statepoint generates the following Locations:
559
560* Constant which describes the calling convention of the call target. This
561  constant is a valid :ref:`calling convention identifier <callingconv>` for
562  the version of LLVM used to generate the stackmap. No additional compatibility
563  guarantees are made for this constant over what LLVM provides elsewhere w.r.t.
564  these identifiers.
565* Constant which describes the flags passed to the statepoint intrinsic
566* Constant which describes number of following deopt *Locations* (not
567  operands)
568* Variable number of Locations, one for each deopt parameter listed in
569  the IR statepoint (same number as described by previous Constant)
570* Variable number of Locations pairs, one pair for each unique pointer
571  which needs relocated.  The first Location in each pair describes
572  the base pointer for the object.  The second is the derived pointer
573  actually being relocated.  It is guaranteed that the base pointer
574  must also appear explicitly as a relocation pair if used after the
575  statepoint. There may be fewer pairs then gc parameters in the IR
576  statepoint. Each *unique* pair will occur at least once; duplicates
577  are possible.
578
579Note that the Locations used in each section may describe the same
580physical location.  e.g. A stack slot may appear as a deopt location,
581a gc base pointer, and a gc derived pointer.
582
583The LiveOut section of the StkMapRecord will be empty for a statepoint
584record.
585
586Safepoint Semantics & Verification
587==================================
588
589The fundamental correctness property for the compiled code's
590correctness w.r.t. the garbage collector is a dynamic one.  It must be
591the case that there is no dynamic trace such that a operation
592involving a potentially relocated pointer is observably-after a
593safepoint which could relocate it.  'observably-after' is this usage
594means that an outside observer could observe this sequence of events
595in a way which precludes the operation being performed before the
596safepoint.
597
598To understand why this 'observable-after' property is required,
599consider a null comparison performed on the original copy of a
600relocated pointer.  Assuming that control flow follows the safepoint,
601there is no way to observe externally whether the null comparison is
602performed before or after the safepoint.  (Remember, the original
603Value is unmodified by the safepoint.)  The compiler is free to make
604either scheduling choice.
605
606The actual correctness property implemented is slightly stronger than
607this.  We require that there be no *static path* on which a
608potentially relocated pointer is 'observably-after' it may have been
609relocated.  This is slightly stronger than is strictly necessary (and
610thus may disallow some otherwise valid programs), but greatly
611simplifies reasoning about correctness of the compiled code.
612
613By construction, this property will be upheld by the optimizer if
614correctly established in the source IR.  This is a key invariant of
615the design.
616
617The existing IR Verifier pass has been extended to check most of the
618local restrictions on the intrinsics mentioned in their respective
619documentation.  The current implementation in LLVM does not check the
620key relocation invariant, but this is ongoing work on developing such
621a verifier.  Please ask on llvm-dev if you're interested in
622experimenting with the current version.
623
624.. _statepoint-utilities:
625
626Utility Passes for Safepoint Insertion
627======================================
628
629.. _RewriteStatepointsForGC:
630
631RewriteStatepointsForGC
632^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
633
634The pass RewriteStatepointsForGC transforms a functions IR by replacing a
635``gc.statepoint`` (with an optional ``gc.result``) with a full relocation
636sequence, including all required ``gc.relocates``.  To function, the pass
637requires that the GC strategy specified for the function be able to reliably
638distinguish between GC references and non-GC references in IR it is given.
639
640As an example, given this code:
641
642.. code-block:: llvm
643
644  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
645         gc "statepoint-example" {
646    call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
647    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj
648  }
649
650The pass would produce this IR:
651
652.. code-block:: llvm
653
654  define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
655         gc "statepoint-example" {
656    %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
657    %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 12, i32 12)
658    ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
659  }
660
661In the above examples, the addrspace(1) marker on the pointers is the mechanism
662that the ``statepoint-example`` GC strategy uses to distinguish references from
663non references.  Address space 1 is not globally reserved for this purpose.
664
665This pass can be used an utility function by a language frontend that doesn't
666want to manually reason about liveness, base pointers, or relocation when
667constructing IR.  As currently implemented, RewriteStatepointsForGC must be
668run after SSA construction (i.e. mem2ref).
669
670RewriteStatepointsForGC will ensure that appropriate base pointers are listed
671for every relocation created.  It will do so by duplicating code as needed to
672propagate the base pointer associated with each pointer being relocated to
673the appropriate safepoints.  The implementation assumes that the following
674IR constructs produce base pointers: loads from the heap, addresses of global
675variables, function arguments, function return values. Constant pointers (such
676as null) are also assumed to be base pointers.  In practice, this constraint
677can be relaxed to producing interior derived pointers provided the target
678collector can find the associated allocation from an arbitrary interior
679derived pointer.
680
681In practice, RewriteStatepointsForGC can be run much later in the pass
682pipeline, after most optimization is already done.  This helps to improve
683the quality of the generated code when compiled with garbage collection support.
684In the long run, this is the intended usage model.  At this time, a few details
685have yet to be worked out about the semantic model required to guarantee this
686is always correct.  As such, please use with caution and report bugs.
687
688.. _PlaceSafepoints:
689
690PlaceSafepoints
691^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
692
693The pass PlaceSafepoints transforms a function's IR by replacing any call or
694invoke instructions with appropriate ``gc.statepoint`` and ``gc.result`` pairs,
695and inserting safepoint polls sufficient to ensure running code checks for a
696safepoint request on a timely manner.  This pass is expected to be run before
697RewriteStatepointsForGC and thus does not produce full relocation sequences.
698
699As an example, given input IR of the following:
700
701.. code-block:: llvm
702
703  define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" {
704    call void @foo()
705    ret void
706  }
707
708  declare void @do_safepoint()
709  define void @gc.safepoint_poll() {
710    call void @do_safepoint()
711    ret void
712  }
713
714
715This pass would produce the following IR:
716
717.. code-block:: llvm
718
719  define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" {
720    %safepoint_token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @do_safepoint, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
721    %safepoint_token1 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
722    ret void
723  }
724
725In this case, we've added an (unconditional) entry safepoint poll and converted the call into a ``gc.statepoint``.  Note that despite appearances, the entry poll is not necessarily redundant.  We'd have to know that ``foo`` and ``test`` were not mutually recursive for the poll to be redundant.  In practice, you'd probably want to your poll definition to contain a conditional branch of some form.
726
727
728At the moment, PlaceSafepoints can insert safepoint polls at method entry and
729loop backedges locations.  Extending this to work with return polls would be
730straight forward if desired.
731
732PlaceSafepoints includes a number of optimizations to avoid placing safepoint
733polls at particular sites unless needed to ensure timely execution of a poll
734under normal conditions.  PlaceSafepoints does not attempt to ensure timely
735execution of a poll under worst case conditions such as heavy system paging.
736
737The implementation of a safepoint poll action is specified by looking up a
738function of the name ``gc.safepoint_poll`` in the containing Module.  The body
739of this function is inserted at each poll site desired.  While calls or invokes
740inside this method are transformed to a ``gc.statepoints``, recursive poll
741insertion is not performed.
742
743By default PlaceSafepoints passes in ``0xABCDEF00`` as the statepoint
744ID and ``0`` as the number of patchable bytes to the newly constructed
745``gc.statepoint``.  These values can be configured on a per-callsite
746basis using the attributes ``"statepoint-id"`` and
747``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"``.  If a call site is marked with a
748``"statepoint-id"`` function attribute and its value is a positive
749integer (represented as a string), then that value is used as the ID
750of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``.  If a call site is marked
751with a ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` function attribute and its
752value is a positive integer, then that value is used as the 'num patch
753bytes' parameter of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``.  The
754``"statepoint-id"`` and ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` attributes
755are not propagated to the ``gc.statepoint`` call or invoke if they
756could be successfully parsed.
757
758If you are scheduling the RewriteStatepointsForGC pass late in the pass order,
759you should probably schedule this pass immediately before it.  The exception
760would be if you need to preserve abstract frame information (e.g. for
761deoptimization or introspection) at safepoints.  In that case, ask on the
762llvm-dev mailing list for suggestions.
763
764
765Supported Architectures
766=======================
767
768Support for statepoint generation requires some code for each backend.
769Today, only X86_64 is supported.
770
771Bugs and Enhancements
772=====================
773
774Currently known bugs and enhancements under consideration can be
775tracked by performing a `bugzilla search
776<http://llvm.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=Statepoint%20Bugs&list_id=64342>`_
777for [Statepoint] in the summary field. When filing new bugs, please
778use this tag so that interested parties see the newly filed bug.  As
779with most LLVM features, design discussions take place on `llvm-dev
780<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_, and patches
781should be sent to `llvm-commits
782<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>`_ for review.
783
784