1===================================== 2Garbage Collection Safepoints in LLVM 3===================================== 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 :depth: 2 8 9Status 10======= 11 12This document describes a set of experimental extensions to LLVM. Use 13with caution. Because the intrinsics have experimental status, 14compatibility across LLVM releases is not guaranteed. 15 16LLVM currently supports an alternate mechanism for conservative 17garbage collection support using the ``gcroot`` intrinsic. The mechanism 18described here shares little in common with the alternate ``gcroot`` 19implementation and it is hoped that this mechanism will eventually 20replace the gc_root mechanism. 21 22Overview 23======== 24 25To collect dead objects, garbage collectors must be able to identify 26any references to objects contained within executing code, and, 27depending on the collector, potentially update them. The collector 28does not need this information at all points in code - that would make 29the problem much harder - but only at well-defined points in the 30execution known as 'safepoints' For most collectors, it is sufficient 31to track at least one copy of each unique pointer value. However, for 32a collector which wishes to relocate objects directly reachable from 33running code, a higher standard is required. 34 35One additional challenge is that the compiler may compute intermediate 36results ("derived pointers") which point outside of the allocation or 37even into the middle of another allocation. The eventual use of this 38intermediate value must yield an address within the bounds of the 39allocation, but such "exterior derived pointers" may be visible to the 40collector. Given this, a garbage collector can not safely rely on the 41runtime value of an address to indicate the object it is associated 42with. If the garbage collector wishes to move any object, the 43compiler must provide a mapping, for each pointer, to an indication of 44its allocation. 45 46To simplify the interaction between a collector and the compiled code, 47most garbage collectors are organized in terms of three abstractions: 48load barriers, store barriers, and safepoints. 49 50#. A load barrier is a bit of code executed immediately after the 51 machine load instruction, but before any use of the value loaded. 52 Depending on the collector, such a barrier may be needed for all 53 loads, merely loads of a particular type (in the original source 54 language), or none at all. 55 56#. Analogously, a store barrier is a code fragment that runs 57 immediately before the machine store instruction, but after the 58 computation of the value stored. The most common use of a store 59 barrier is to update a 'card table' in a generational garbage 60 collector. 61 62#. A safepoint is a location at which pointers visible to the compiled 63 code (i.e. currently in registers or on the stack) are allowed to 64 change. After the safepoint completes, the actual pointer value 65 may differ, but the 'object' (as seen by the source language) 66 pointed to will not. 67 68 Note that the term 'safepoint' is somewhat overloaded. It refers to 69 both the location at which the machine state is parsable and the 70 coordination protocol involved in bring application threads to a 71 point at which the collector can safely use that information. The 72 term "statepoint" as used in this document refers exclusively to the 73 former. 74 75This document focuses on the last item - compiler support for 76safepoints in generated code. We will assume that an outside 77mechanism has decided where to place safepoints. From our 78perspective, all safepoints will be function calls. To support 79relocation of objects directly reachable from values in compiled code, 80the collector must be able to: 81 82#. identify every copy of a pointer (including copies introduced by 83 the compiler itself) at the safepoint, 84#. identify which object each pointer relates to, and 85#. potentially update each of those copies. 86 87This document describes the mechanism by which an LLVM based compiler 88can provide this information to a language runtime/collector, and 89ensure that all pointers can be read and updated if desired. The 90heart of the approach is to construct (or rewrite) the IR in a manner 91where the possible updates performed by the garbage collector are 92explicitly visible in the IR. Doing so requires that we: 93 94#. create a new SSA value for each potentially relocated pointer, and 95 ensure that no uses of the original (non relocated) value is 96 reachable after the safepoint, 97#. specify the relocation in a way which is opaque to the compiler to 98 ensure that the optimizer can not introduce new uses of an 99 unrelocated value after a statepoint. This prevents the optimizer 100 from performing unsound optimizations. 101#. recording a mapping of live pointers (and the allocation they're 102 associated with) for each statepoint. 103 104At the most abstract level, inserting a safepoint can be thought of as 105replacing a call instruction with a call to a multiple return value 106function which both calls the original target of the call, returns 107it's result, and returns updated values for any live pointers to 108garbage collected objects. 109 110 Note that the task of identifying all live pointers to garbage 111 collected values, transforming the IR to expose a pointer giving the 112 base object for every such live pointer, and inserting all the 113 intrinsics correctly is explicitly out of scope for this document. 114 The recommended approach is to use the :ref:`utility passes 115 <statepoint-utilities>` described below. 116 117This abstract function call is concretely represented by a sequence of 118intrinsic calls known collectively as a "statepoint relocation sequence". 119 120Let's consider a simple call in LLVM IR: 121 122.. code-block:: llvm 123 124 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 125 gc "statepoint-example" { 126 call void ()* @foo() 127 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj 128 } 129 130Depending on our language we may need to allow a safepoint during the execution 131of ``foo``. If so, we need to let the collector update local values in the 132current frame. If we don't, we'll be accessing a potential invalid reference 133once we eventually return from the call. 134 135In this example, we need to relocate the SSA value ``%obj``. Since we can't 136actually change the value in the SSA value ``%obj``, we need to introduce a new 137SSA value ``%obj.relocated`` which represents the potentially changed value of 138``%obj`` after the safepoint and update any following uses appropriately. The 139resulting relocation sequence is: 140 141.. code-block:: llvm 142 143 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 144 gc "statepoint-example" { 145 %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 146 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 7, i32 7) 147 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated 148 } 149 150Ideally, this sequence would have been represented as a M argument, N 151return value function (where M is the number of values being 152relocated + the original call arguments and N is the original return 153value + each relocated value), but LLVM does not easily support such a 154representation. 155 156Instead, the statepoint intrinsic marks the actual site of the 157safepoint or statepoint. The statepoint returns a token value (which 158exists only at compile time). To get back the original return value 159of the call, we use the ``gc.result`` intrinsic. To get the relocation 160of each pointer in turn, we use the ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic with the 161appropriate index. Note that both the ``gc.relocate`` and ``gc.result`` are 162tied to the statepoint. The combination forms a "statepoint relocation 163sequence" and represents the entirety of a parseable call or 'statepoint'. 164 165When lowered, this example would generate the following x86 assembly: 166 167.. code-block:: gas 168 169 .globl test1 170 .align 16, 0x90 171 pushq %rax 172 callq foo 173 .Ltmp1: 174 movq (%rsp), %rax # This load is redundant (oops!) 175 popq %rdx 176 retq 177 178Each of the potentially relocated values has been spilled to the 179stack, and a record of that location has been recorded to the 180:ref:`Stack Map section <stackmap-section>`. If the garbage collector 181needs to update any of these pointers during the call, it knows 182exactly what to change. 183 184The relevant parts of the StackMap section for our example are: 185 186.. code-block:: gas 187 188 # This describes the call site 189 # Stack Maps: callsite 2882400000 190 .quad 2882400000 191 .long .Ltmp1-test1 192 .short 0 193 # .. 8 entries skipped .. 194 # This entry describes the spill slot which is directly addressable 195 # off RSP with offset 0. Given the value was spilled with a pushq, 196 # that makes sense. 197 # Stack Maps: Loc 8: Direct RSP [encoding: .byte 2, .byte 8, .short 7, .int 0] 198 .byte 2 199 .byte 8 200 .short 7 201 .long 0 202 203This example was taken from the tests for the :ref:`RewriteStatepointsForGC` utility pass. As such, it's full StackMap can be easily examined with the following command. 204 205.. code-block:: bash 206 207 opt -rewrite-statepoints-for-gc test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/basics.ll -S | llc -debug-only=stackmaps 208 209Base & Derived Pointers 210^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 211 212A "base pointer" is one which points to the starting address of an allocation 213(object). A "derived pointer" is one which is offset from a base pointer by 214some amount. When relocating objects, a garbage collector needs to be able 215to relocate each derived pointer associated with an allocation to the same 216offset from the new address. 217 218"Interior derived pointers" remain within the bounds of the allocation 219they're associated with. As a result, the base object can be found at 220runtime provided the bounds of allocations are known to the runtime system. 221 222"Exterior derived pointers" are outside the bounds of the associated object; 223they may even fall within *another* allocations address range. As a result, 224there is no way for a garbage collector to determine which allocation they 225are associated with at runtime and compiler support is needed. 226 227The ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic supports an explicit operand for describing the 228allocation associated with a derived pointer. This operand is frequently 229referred to as the base operand, but does not strictly speaking have to be 230a base pointer, but it does need to lie within the bounds of the associated 231allocation. Some collectors may require that the operand be an actual base 232pointer rather than merely an internal derived pointer. Note that during 233lowering both the base and derived pointer operands are required to be live 234over the associated call safepoint even if the base is otherwise unused 235afterwards. 236 237If we extend our previous example to include a pointless derived pointer, 238we get: 239 240.. code-block:: llvm 241 242 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 243 gc "statepoint-example" { 244 %gep = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i64 20000 245 %token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep) 246 %obj.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %token, i32 7, i32 7) 247 %gep.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %token, i32 7, i32 8) 248 %p = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep, i64 -20000 249 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %p 250 } 251 252Note that in this example %p and %obj.relocate are the same address and we 253could replace one with the other, potentially removing the derived pointer 254from the live set at the safepoint entirely. 255 256GC Transitions 257^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 258 259As a practical consideration, many garbage-collected systems allow code that is 260collector-aware ("managed code") to call code that is not collector-aware 261("unmanaged code"). It is common that such calls must also be safepoints, since 262it is desirable to allow the collector to run during the execution of 263unmanaged code. Futhermore, it is common that coordinating the transition from 264managed to unmanaged code requires extra code generation at the call site to 265inform the collector of the transition. In order to support these needs, a 266statepoint may be marked as a GC transition, and data that is necessary to 267perform the transition (if any) may be provided as additional arguments to the 268statepoint. 269 270 Note that although in many cases statepoints may be inferred to be GC 271 transitions based on the function symbols involved (e.g. a call from a 272 function with GC strategy "foo" to a function with GC strategy "bar"), 273 indirect calls that are also GC transitions must also be supported. This 274 requirement is the driving force behind the decision to require that GC 275 transitions are explicitly marked. 276 277Let's revisit the sample given above, this time treating the call to ``@foo`` 278as a GC transition. Depending on our target, the transition code may need to 279access some extra state in order to inform the collector of the transition. 280Let's assume a hypothetical GC--somewhat unimaginatively named "hypothetical-gc" 281--that requires that a TLS variable must be written to before and after a call 282to unmanaged code. The resulting relocation sequence is: 283 284.. code-block:: llvm 285 286 @flag = thread_local global i32 0, align 4 287 288 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1) *%obj) 289 gc "hypothetical-gc" { 290 291 %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 1, i32* @Flag, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 292 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 7, i32 7) 293 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated 294 } 295 296During lowering, this will result in a instruction selection DAG that looks 297something like: 298 299:: 300 301 CALLSEQ_START 302 ... 303 GC_TRANSITION_START (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32* Flag 304 STATEPOINT 305 GC_TRANSITION_END (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32 *Flag 306 ... 307 CALLSEQ_END 308 309In order to generate the necessary transition code, the backend for each target 310supported by "hypothetical-gc" must be modified to lower ``GC_TRANSITION_START`` 311and ``GC_TRANSITION_END`` nodes appropriately when the "hypothetical-gc" 312strategy is in use for a particular function. Assuming that such lowering has 313been added for X86, the generated assembly would be: 314 315.. code-block:: gas 316 317 .globl test1 318 .align 16, 0x90 319 pushq %rax 320 movl $1, %fs:Flag@TPOFF 321 callq foo 322 movl $0, %fs:Flag@TPOFF 323 .Ltmp1: 324 movq (%rsp), %rax # This load is redundant (oops!) 325 popq %rdx 326 retq 327 328Note that the design as presented above is not fully implemented: in particular, 329strategy-specific lowering is not present, and all GC transitions are emitted as 330as single no-op before and after the call instruction. These no-ops are often 331removed by the backend during dead machine instruction elimination. 332 333 334Intrinsics 335=========== 336 337'llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint' Intrinsic 338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 339 340Syntax: 341""""""" 342 343:: 344 345 declare i32 346 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(i64 <id>, i32 <num patch bytes>, 347 func_type <target>, 348 i64 <#call args>, i64 <flags>, 349 ... (call parameters), 350 i64 <# transition args>, ... (transition parameters), 351 i64 <# deopt args>, ... (deopt parameters), 352 ... (gc parameters)) 353 354Overview: 355""""""""" 356 357The statepoint intrinsic represents a call which is parse-able by the 358runtime. 359 360Operands: 361""""""""" 362 363The 'id' operand is a constant integer that is reported as the ID 364field in the generated stackmap. LLVM does not interpret this 365parameter in any way and its meaning is up to the statepoint user to 366decide. Note that LLVM is free to duplicate code containing 367statepoint calls, and this may transform IR that had a unique 'id' per 368lexical call to statepoint to IR that does not. 369 370If 'num patch bytes' is non-zero then the call instruction 371corresponding to the statepoint is not emitted and LLVM emits 'num 372patch bytes' bytes of nops in its place. LLVM will emit code to 373prepare the function arguments and retrieve the function return value 374in accordance to the calling convention; the former before the nop 375sequence and the latter after the nop sequence. It is expected that 376the user will patch over the 'num patch bytes' bytes of nops with a 377calling sequence specific to their runtime before executing the 378generated machine code. There are no guarantees with respect to the 379alignment of the nop sequence. Unlike :doc:`StackMaps` statepoints do 380not have a concept of shadow bytes. Note that semantically the 381statepoint still represents a call or invoke to 'target', and the nop 382sequence after patching is expected to represent an operation 383equivalent to a call or invoke to 'target'. 384 385The 'target' operand is the function actually being called. The 386target can be specified as either a symbolic LLVM function, or as an 387arbitrary Value of appropriate function type. Note that the function 388type must match the signature of the callee and the types of the 'call 389parameters' arguments. 390 391The '#call args' operand is the number of arguments to the actual 392call. It must exactly match the number of arguments passed in the 393'call parameters' variable length section. 394 395The 'flags' operand is used to specify extra information about the 396statepoint. This is currently only used to mark certain statepoints 397as GC transitions. This operand is a 64-bit integer with the following 398layout, where bit 0 is the least significant bit: 399 400 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+ 401 | Bit # | Usage | 402 +=======+===================================================+ 403 | 0 | Set if the statepoint is a GC transition, cleared | 404 | | otherwise. | 405 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+ 406 | 1-63 | Reserved for future use; must be cleared. | 407 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+ 408 409The 'call parameters' arguments are simply the arguments which need to 410be passed to the call target. They will be lowered according to the 411specified calling convention and otherwise handled like a normal call 412instruction. The number of arguments must exactly match what is 413specified in '# call args'. The types must match the signature of 414'target'. 415 416The 'transition parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of 417Values which need to be passed to GC transition code. They will be 418lowered and passed as operands to the appropriate GC_TRANSITION nodes 419in the selection DAG. It is assumed that these arguments must be 420available before and after (but not necessarily during) the execution 421of the callee. The '# transition args' field indicates how many operands 422are to be interpreted as 'transition parameters'. 423 424The 'deopt parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of Values 425which is meaningful to the runtime. The runtime may read any of these 426values, but is assumed not to modify them. If the garbage collector 427might need to modify one of these values, it must also be listed in 428the 'gc pointer' argument list. The '# deopt args' field indicates 429how many operands are to be interpreted as 'deopt parameters'. 430 431The 'gc parameters' arguments contain every pointer to a garbage 432collector object which potentially needs to be updated by the garbage 433collector. Note that the argument list must explicitly contain a base 434pointer for every derived pointer listed. The order of arguments is 435unimportant. Unlike the other variable length parameter sets, this 436list is not length prefixed. 437 438Semantics: 439"""""""""" 440 441A statepoint is assumed to read and write all memory. As a result, 442memory operations can not be reordered past a statepoint. It is 443illegal to mark a statepoint as being either 'readonly' or 'readnone'. 444 445Note that legal IR can not perform any memory operation on a 'gc 446pointer' argument of the statepoint in a location statically reachable 447from the statepoint. Instead, the explicitly relocated value (from a 448``gc.relocate``) must be used. 449 450'llvm.experimental.gc.result' Intrinsic 451^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 452 453Syntax: 454""""""" 455 456:: 457 458 declare type* 459 @llvm.experimental.gc.result(i32 %statepoint_token) 460 461Overview: 462""""""""" 463 464``gc.result`` extracts the result of the original call instruction 465which was replaced by the ``gc.statepoint``. The ``gc.result`` 466intrinsic is actually a family of three intrinsics due to an 467implementation limitation. Other than the type of the return value, 468the semantics are the same. 469 470Operands: 471""""""""" 472 473The first and only argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts 474the safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.result`` is a part. 475Despite the typing of this as a generic i32, *only* the value defined 476by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here. 477 478Semantics: 479"""""""""" 480 481The ``gc.result`` represents the return value of the call target of 482the ``statepoint``. The type of the ``gc.result`` must exactly match 483the type of the target. If the call target returns void, there will 484be no ``gc.result``. 485 486A ``gc.result`` is modeled as a 'readnone' pure function. It has no 487side effects since it is just a projection of the return value of the 488previous call represented by the ``gc.statepoint``. 489 490'llvm.experimental.gc.relocate' Intrinsic 491^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 492 493Syntax: 494""""""" 495 496:: 497 498 declare <pointer type> 499 @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate(i32 %statepoint_token, 500 i32 %base_offset, 501 i32 %pointer_offset) 502 503Overview: 504""""""""" 505 506A ``gc.relocate`` returns the potentially relocated value of a pointer 507at the safepoint. 508 509Operands: 510""""""""" 511 512The first argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts the 513safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.relocation`` is a part. 514Despite the typing of this as a generic i32, *only* the value defined 515by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here. 516 517The second argument is an index into the statepoints list of arguments 518which specifies the allocation for the pointer being relocated. 519This index must land within the 'gc parameter' section of the 520statepoint's argument list. The associated value must be within the 521object with which the pointer being relocated is associated. The optimizer 522is free to change *which* interior derived pointer is reported, provided that 523it does not replace an actual base pointer with another interior derived 524pointer. Collectors are allowed to rely on the base pointer operand 525remaining an actual base pointer if so constructed. 526 527The third argument is an index into the statepoint's list of arguments 528which specify the (potentially) derived pointer being relocated. It 529is legal for this index to be the same as the second argument 530if-and-only-if a base pointer is being relocated. This index must land 531within the 'gc parameter' section of the statepoint's argument list. 532 533Semantics: 534"""""""""" 535 536The return value of ``gc.relocate`` is the potentially relocated value 537of the pointer specified by it's arguments. It is unspecified how the 538value of the returned pointer relates to the argument to the 539``gc.statepoint`` other than that a) it points to the same source 540language object with the same offset, and b) the 'based-on' 541relationship of the newly relocated pointers is a projection of the 542unrelocated pointers. In particular, the integer value of the pointer 543returned is unspecified. 544 545A ``gc.relocate`` is modeled as a ``readnone`` pure function. It has no 546side effects since it is just a way to extract information about work 547done during the actual call modeled by the ``gc.statepoint``. 548 549.. _statepoint-stackmap-format: 550 551Stack Map Format 552================ 553 554Locations for each pointer value which may need read and/or updated by 555the runtime or collector are provided via the :ref:`Stack Map format 556<stackmap-format>` specified in the PatchPoint documentation. 557 558Each statepoint generates the following Locations: 559 560* Constant which describes the calling convention of the call target. This 561 constant is a valid :ref:`calling convention identifier <callingconv>` for 562 the version of LLVM used to generate the stackmap. No additional compatibility 563 guarantees are made for this constant over what LLVM provides elsewhere w.r.t. 564 these identifiers. 565* Constant which describes the flags passed to the statepoint intrinsic 566* Constant which describes number of following deopt *Locations* (not 567 operands) 568* Variable number of Locations, one for each deopt parameter listed in 569 the IR statepoint (same number as described by previous Constant) 570* Variable number of Locations pairs, one pair for each unique pointer 571 which needs relocated. The first Location in each pair describes 572 the base pointer for the object. The second is the derived pointer 573 actually being relocated. It is guaranteed that the base pointer 574 must also appear explicitly as a relocation pair if used after the 575 statepoint. There may be fewer pairs then gc parameters in the IR 576 statepoint. Each *unique* pair will occur at least once; duplicates 577 are possible. 578 579Note that the Locations used in each section may describe the same 580physical location. e.g. A stack slot may appear as a deopt location, 581a gc base pointer, and a gc derived pointer. 582 583The LiveOut section of the StkMapRecord will be empty for a statepoint 584record. 585 586Safepoint Semantics & Verification 587================================== 588 589The fundamental correctness property for the compiled code's 590correctness w.r.t. the garbage collector is a dynamic one. It must be 591the case that there is no dynamic trace such that a operation 592involving a potentially relocated pointer is observably-after a 593safepoint which could relocate it. 'observably-after' is this usage 594means that an outside observer could observe this sequence of events 595in a way which precludes the operation being performed before the 596safepoint. 597 598To understand why this 'observable-after' property is required, 599consider a null comparison performed on the original copy of a 600relocated pointer. Assuming that control flow follows the safepoint, 601there is no way to observe externally whether the null comparison is 602performed before or after the safepoint. (Remember, the original 603Value is unmodified by the safepoint.) The compiler is free to make 604either scheduling choice. 605 606The actual correctness property implemented is slightly stronger than 607this. We require that there be no *static path* on which a 608potentially relocated pointer is 'observably-after' it may have been 609relocated. This is slightly stronger than is strictly necessary (and 610thus may disallow some otherwise valid programs), but greatly 611simplifies reasoning about correctness of the compiled code. 612 613By construction, this property will be upheld by the optimizer if 614correctly established in the source IR. This is a key invariant of 615the design. 616 617The existing IR Verifier pass has been extended to check most of the 618local restrictions on the intrinsics mentioned in their respective 619documentation. The current implementation in LLVM does not check the 620key relocation invariant, but this is ongoing work on developing such 621a verifier. Please ask on llvm-dev if you're interested in 622experimenting with the current version. 623 624.. _statepoint-utilities: 625 626Utility Passes for Safepoint Insertion 627====================================== 628 629.. _RewriteStatepointsForGC: 630 631RewriteStatepointsForGC 632^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 633 634The pass RewriteStatepointsForGC transforms a functions IR by replacing a 635``gc.statepoint`` (with an optional ``gc.result``) with a full relocation 636sequence, including all required ``gc.relocates``. To function, the pass 637requires that the GC strategy specified for the function be able to reliably 638distinguish between GC references and non-GC references in IR it is given. 639 640As an example, given this code: 641 642.. code-block:: llvm 643 644 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 645 gc "statepoint-example" { 646 call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0) 647 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj 648 } 649 650The pass would produce this IR: 651 652.. code-block:: llvm 653 654 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 655 gc "statepoint-example" { 656 %0 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj) 657 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(i32 %0, i32 12, i32 12) 658 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated 659 } 660 661In the above examples, the addrspace(1) marker on the pointers is the mechanism 662that the ``statepoint-example`` GC strategy uses to distinguish references from 663non references. Address space 1 is not globally reserved for this purpose. 664 665This pass can be used an utility function by a language frontend that doesn't 666want to manually reason about liveness, base pointers, or relocation when 667constructing IR. As currently implemented, RewriteStatepointsForGC must be 668run after SSA construction (i.e. mem2ref). 669 670RewriteStatepointsForGC will ensure that appropriate base pointers are listed 671for every relocation created. It will do so by duplicating code as needed to 672propagate the base pointer associated with each pointer being relocated to 673the appropriate safepoints. The implementation assumes that the following 674IR constructs produce base pointers: loads from the heap, addresses of global 675variables, function arguments, function return values. Constant pointers (such 676as null) are also assumed to be base pointers. In practice, this constraint 677can be relaxed to producing interior derived pointers provided the target 678collector can find the associated allocation from an arbitrary interior 679derived pointer. 680 681In practice, RewriteStatepointsForGC can be run much later in the pass 682pipeline, after most optimization is already done. This helps to improve 683the quality of the generated code when compiled with garbage collection support. 684In the long run, this is the intended usage model. At this time, a few details 685have yet to be worked out about the semantic model required to guarantee this 686is always correct. As such, please use with caution and report bugs. 687 688.. _PlaceSafepoints: 689 690PlaceSafepoints 691^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 692 693The pass PlaceSafepoints transforms a function's IR by replacing any call or 694invoke instructions with appropriate ``gc.statepoint`` and ``gc.result`` pairs, 695and inserting safepoint polls sufficient to ensure running code checks for a 696safepoint request on a timely manner. This pass is expected to be run before 697RewriteStatepointsForGC and thus does not produce full relocation sequences. 698 699As an example, given input IR of the following: 700 701.. code-block:: llvm 702 703 define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" { 704 call void @foo() 705 ret void 706 } 707 708 declare void @do_safepoint() 709 define void @gc.safepoint_poll() { 710 call void @do_safepoint() 711 ret void 712 } 713 714 715This pass would produce the following IR: 716 717.. code-block:: llvm 718 719 define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" { 720 %safepoint_token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @do_safepoint, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0) 721 %safepoint_token1 = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0) 722 ret void 723 } 724 725In this case, we've added an (unconditional) entry safepoint poll and converted the call into a ``gc.statepoint``. Note that despite appearances, the entry poll is not necessarily redundant. We'd have to know that ``foo`` and ``test`` were not mutually recursive for the poll to be redundant. In practice, you'd probably want to your poll definition to contain a conditional branch of some form. 726 727 728At the moment, PlaceSafepoints can insert safepoint polls at method entry and 729loop backedges locations. Extending this to work with return polls would be 730straight forward if desired. 731 732PlaceSafepoints includes a number of optimizations to avoid placing safepoint 733polls at particular sites unless needed to ensure timely execution of a poll 734under normal conditions. PlaceSafepoints does not attempt to ensure timely 735execution of a poll under worst case conditions such as heavy system paging. 736 737The implementation of a safepoint poll action is specified by looking up a 738function of the name ``gc.safepoint_poll`` in the containing Module. The body 739of this function is inserted at each poll site desired. While calls or invokes 740inside this method are transformed to a ``gc.statepoints``, recursive poll 741insertion is not performed. 742 743By default PlaceSafepoints passes in ``0xABCDEF00`` as the statepoint 744ID and ``0`` as the number of patchable bytes to the newly constructed 745``gc.statepoint``. These values can be configured on a per-callsite 746basis using the attributes ``"statepoint-id"`` and 747``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"``. If a call site is marked with a 748``"statepoint-id"`` function attribute and its value is a positive 749integer (represented as a string), then that value is used as the ID 750of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``. If a call site is marked 751with a ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` function attribute and its 752value is a positive integer, then that value is used as the 'num patch 753bytes' parameter of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``. The 754``"statepoint-id"`` and ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` attributes 755are not propagated to the ``gc.statepoint`` call or invoke if they 756could be successfully parsed. 757 758If you are scheduling the RewriteStatepointsForGC pass late in the pass order, 759you should probably schedule this pass immediately before it. The exception 760would be if you need to preserve abstract frame information (e.g. for 761deoptimization or introspection) at safepoints. In that case, ask on the 762llvm-dev mailing list for suggestions. 763 764 765Supported Architectures 766======================= 767 768Support for statepoint generation requires some code for each backend. 769Today, only X86_64 is supported. 770 771Bugs and Enhancements 772===================== 773 774Currently known bugs and enhancements under consideration can be 775tracked by performing a `bugzilla search 776<http://llvm.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=Statepoint%20Bugs&list_id=64342>`_ 777for [Statepoint] in the summary field. When filing new bugs, please 778use this tag so that interested parties see the newly filed bug. As 779with most LLVM features, design discussions take place on `llvm-dev 780<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_, and patches 781should be sent to `llvm-commits 782<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>`_ for review. 783 784