1syntax = "proto3";
2
3// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
4// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
5
6// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
7option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
8
9package unittest_issues;
10option optimize_for = SPEED;
11
12// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
13// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
14message Issue307 {
15  message NestedOnce {
16    message NestedTwice {
17    }
18  }
19}
20
21// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
22// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
23
24// message A {
25//    optional int32 _A = 1;
26// }
27
28// message B {
29//    optional int32 B_ = 1;
30// }
31
32//message AB {
33//    optional int32 a_b = 1;
34//}
35
36// Similar issue with numeric names
37// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
38// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
39// message NumberField {
40//    optional int32 _01 = 1;
41// }
42
43// issue 19 - negative enum values
44
45enum NegativeEnum {
46    NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
47    FiveBelow = -5;
48    MinusOne = -1;
49}
50
51message NegativeEnumMessage {
52    NegativeEnum value = 1;
53    repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
54    repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
55}
56
57// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
58// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
59
60message DeprecatedChild {
61}
62
63enum DeprecatedEnum {
64    DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
65    one = 1;
66}
67
68message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
69    int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
70    repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
71
72    DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
73    repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
74
75    DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
76    repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
77}
78
79// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
80message ItemField {
81  int32 item = 1;
82}
83
84message ReservedNames {
85  // Force a nested type called Types
86  message SomeNestedType {
87  }
88
89  int32 types = 1;
90  int32 descriptor = 2;
91}
92
93message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
94  // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
95  // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
96  // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
97  // ordering.
98  // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
99  // but doesn't include oneofs.
100  // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
101  // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
102  // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
103  // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
104
105  int32 plain_int32 = 4;
106
107  oneof o1 {
108    string o1_string = 2;
109    int32 o1_int32 = 5;
110  }
111
112  string plain_string = 1;
113
114  oneof o2 {
115    int32 o2_int32 = 6;
116    string o2_string = 3;
117  }
118
119}
120
121message TestJsonName {
122  // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
123  string name = 1;
124  string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
125  string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
126}
127